2 Samuel 16:5-12

“As King David approached Bahurim, a man from the same clan as Saul’s family came out from there. His name was Shimei son of Gera, and he cursed as he came out. He pelted David and all the king’s officials with stones, though all the troops and the special guard were on David’s right and left. As he cursed, Shimei said, “Get out, get out, you man of blood, you scoundrel! The LORD has repaid you for all the blood you shed in the household of Saul, in whose place you have reigned. The LORD has handed the kingdom over to your son Absalom. You have come to ruin because you are a man of blood!” Then Abishai son of Zeruiah said to the king, “Why should this dead dog curse my lord the king? Let me go over and cut off his head.” But the king said, “What do you and I have in common, you sons of Zeruiah? If he is cursing because the LORD said to him, ‘Curse David,’ who can ask, ‘Why do you do this?'” David then said to Abishai and all his officials, “My son, who is of my own flesh, is trying to take my life. How much more, then, this Benjamite! Leave him alone; let him curse, for the LORD has told him to. It may be that the LORD will see my distress and repay me with good for the cursing I am receiving today.”

It is thought by many, that situations of rank and eminence are conducive to happiness. But the very reverse of this will be found true for the most part, because people in authority are beset with numberless trials and temptations, to which their inferiors are scarcely at all exposed.

Behold David exalted to a throne; and see to what trials he was reduced, by those who sought his favor, or envied him his power! It is the unhappy lot of kings to be surrounded no less by lying friends, than by bitter enemies. When David fled from Absalom, Ziba, the servant of Mephibosheth, the son of Saul, met him with a present of needful provisions for himself and followers, under a feigned plea that Mephibosheth had joined the conspiracy of Absalom, in the hope of regaining his father’s kingdom; and thus he obtained from David a hasty and inadvertent grant of all Mephibosheth’s possessions; a grant, which David afterwards, when better informed, was constrained to rescind.

Scarcely had David been thus betrayed by Ziba, a pretended friend—before he was fiercely assaulted by Shimei, a bitter enemy, who now took advantage of his misfortunes to load him with all manner of reproaches. From this evil, however, David escaped with far greater honor to himself. In the former case he was imposed upon, and was led to act with unwise precipitation; but in this latter case, when urged to avenge himself on the delinquent, he forbore; and thus manifested a disposition of mind that is worthy of universal imitation.

To place David’s conduct in its true light, I will set before you,

I. David’s heavy trial.

His condition, independent of Shimei’s conduct, was exceedingly afflictive.

He was now driven from his throne, and forced to flee for his life. To this he was forced by his own subjects, led on by his favorite son, Absalom. To be reduced to such an extremity by a foreign foe would have been an exceeding great calamity; but to be brought to it by his own beloved son, at the head of his rebellious subjects—was as afflictive a dispensation as could well be conceived.

But in this cup of sorrow there was an ingredient that was incomparably more bitter than even death itself; namely, a consciousness that it proceeded from God, as a punishment of the sin he had committed in the matter of Uriah. Nathan had long ago delivered to him this warning from the Lord, “Behold, I will raise up evil against you out of your house, 2 Samuel 12:11.” And this judgment had already been executed in part, by Amnon’s ravishing of his sister Tamar; and by Absalom’s murder of his brother Amnon; (in both of which there was a solemn correspondence with his own sins in the matter of Bathsheba and Uriah,) and now it came home more immediately to his own person, in the conduct of Absalom towards himself. This consciousness very deeply oppressed his mind, and added a ten-fold poignancy to all his other stings.

But the conduct of Shimei greatly aggravated David’s misfortunes at this time.

It came upon him at a time when he was wounded and disconsolate under the rebukes of the Almighty! Psalm 69:26. And the bitterness of this man’s reproaches could scarcely be exceeded. Shimei, being a Benjamite, was zealous for his own tribe, from whence the sovereign authority had been transferred to the tribe of Judah. (Such jealousies, alas! pervade all ranks and classes of society throughout the world, from rival states to rival districts, communities, towns, families, and parties of every description; and often the feelings subsisting between the adverse parties, are scarcely less acrimonious than those of Shimei himself.) Besides, being of the family of Saul, perhaps Shimei’s prospects in life were in a great measure blasted; and therefore, while he regarded David as the occasion of his ruin, he considered the Deity himself as vindicating his cause, in the punishment of the usurper.

But his accusation of David, as having imbrued his hands in the blood of Saul, was without the least foundation; for it was well known that he had not been in the least degree accessory to the death of Saul, or Jonathan, or of Abner, or Ishbosheth, or of any whose blood was now laid to his charge. But such an accusation, at such a time, was most distressing to the feelings of the royal sufferer; and also because it brought the more forcibly to his mind the evils which he had indeed committed, and for which God was indeed inflicting upon him this sore punishment.

We wonder not at the indignation of Abishai, or at the proposal which he made to avenge his master’s cause on this insulting adversary. But we do wonder at David’s forbearance under this heavy trial, and at,

II. David’s meek submission to his trial.

David would not allow Abishai to execute his proposal, and to inflict on Shimie, this daring rebel, the deserved punishment. He chose rather to endure all the insults that were heaped upon him; and to this he was led by two considerations:

1. David saw the hand of God in this trial.

Repeatedly does he say, that “God had bidden this virulent adversary to curse him;” and from that consideration he puts the question to Abishai, “Who then shall say, Why have you done so? verse 10, 11.” Of course, he did not imagine that God had enjoined this man to behave thus, or had actually infused into his mind a disposition to commit so great a transgression. When “God hardened the heart of Pharaoh, Exodus 4:21,” he only left him to harden his own heart. When God “sent forth an evil and lying spirit into the prophets of Ahab,” he only gave permission to the evil spirit to enter into them, 1 Kings 22:21-23.

In fact, the creature, even while he acts most freely, executes, even as the murderers of our blessed Lord did, “what God’s mind and His counsel had determined before to be done! Acts 4:28.” The creature, whatever his own mind and purpose may be, is only “a rod, or staff, or sword in Jehovah’s hand,” to execute his holy will! Isaiah 10:5-7.

And though this does not excuse the creature, who, in fact, thinks of doing his own will only, it must reconcile us to what is done, no less than if it had been done directly and immediately by God himself! Thus Job viewed the losses he sustained through the rapacity of the Chaldeans and Sabeans, who took away all his cattle, and slew his servants, “Shall I receive good at the Lord’s hands, and shall I not receive evil? The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away! Blessed be the name of the Lord! Job 1:21; Job 2:10.”

From this consideration, David was enabled to submit with meekness to the invectives of Shimei, and to say, as Eli, “It is the Lord; may he do what seems good to him! 1 Samuel 3:18.” This is the account he himself gives us, “I was silent, and opened not my mouth, because You are the one who has done this! Psalm 39:9.”

2. David looked to God to overrule this trial for his good.

It is God’s privilege to bring good out of evil, for the benefit of his believing people. David was no stranger to the history of Joseph, nor of the testimony which Joseph bore respecting the sufferings which had been inflicted on him by his brethren, “It was not you who sent me here; but God, to save your lives by a great deliverance.” “You indeed thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass as it is this day, to save many people alive, Genesis 45:7-8; Genesis 50:20.”

David hoped that God would in some way sanctify to him this dispensation. He well knew, that God “chastens his people for their profit, to make them partakers of his holiness; and that affliction, though not joyous at the present, but grievous, will, through God’s blessing upon it, work out the peaceable fruits of righteousness to them that are exercised thereby, Hebrews 12:10-11.” And he hoped that God would make this severe visitation “work for his good, Romans 8:28;” or, at all events, whatever might be the effect of it here, it would issue well at the last, by “working out for him a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory in the eternal world! 2 Corinthians 4:17.”

This hope pacified and composed his mind, and enabled him to “possess his soul in patience;” while Abishai, yielding to the impulse of an irritated mind, would gladly have executed on the offender the judgment he deserved.

Learn, then, brethren, from this subject,

1. What spirit you are to manifest under any injuries you sustain.

In no respect are you to indulge an angry and vindictive spirit; but, rather, to follow the example of our blessed Lord, who, under the most injurious treatment that ever was endured in this world, opened not his mouth, but was silent, even as a “sheep before its shearers.” Instead of rendering evil for evil, we are to return nothing but good; and to seek for victory in no other way; as God has said, “Do not be overcome of evil; but overcome evil with good.” Doubtless this is a difficult path; but it will surely bring upon us the divine blessing, both in this world and in the world to come.

2. How you are to obtain this submissive spirit to God’s afflictive providences.

You have seen what considerations influenced the mind of David; and the same will produce a similar effect on your minds.

1. The first thing to be sought by you is a deep sense of your own sinfulness. Let that abide upon your minds, and nothing that man can inflict will greatly wound you. However heavy your trial may be, you will say, “Why should any living man complain when punished for his sins? Lamentations 3:39.” Anything short of the miseries of Hell, especially if it tends to avert those miseries, will be accounted rather a mercy to be thankful for, than a judgment to be deplored! Matthew 5:10-12; 1 Peter 4:12-13.

2. The next thing is, to realize in your souls the universal agency of Divine Providence; so as to see, that “no trouble whatever springs out of the dust! Job 5:6,” but that everything, even to the falling of a sparrow, or of a hair from your head—is ordered by the Lord, Matthew 10:29-30. Your nature may indeed recoil from suffering; and you may deprecate it, even as our Lord himself did, when he desired that the cup which had been put into his hands might pass away from him. But this you will do with submission, saying, “Not my will, but may your will be done!” And when you see what the Lord’s will is, you will chide your reluctant spirit, saying, “The cup which my Father has given me—shall I not drink it? John 18:11.”

Finally, look to the outcome of your trials, and then you will be moved by nothing that either men or devils can do, Acts 20:24. “You have heard of Job’s perseverance and have seen what the Lord finally brought about. The Lord is full of compassion and mercy, James 5:11.

If God’s furnace is to purge away your dross, you will not greatly regret that God allows you to be put into it. You will expect his presence with you in your troubles for your comfort and support, Malachi 3:3; Daniel 3:25; and a rich compensation for them in the world to come! 2 Timothy 2:12; Revelation 7:14-15.

Get but these thoughts wrought into your hearts, and you will bear the heaviest calamities with resignation, and “commit your souls to God in well doing, as into the hands of a faithful Creator! 1 Peter 4:19.”

Charles Simeon

2 Samuel 15:30

“But David continued up the Mount of Olives, weeping as he went; his head was covered and he was barefoot. All the people with him covered their heads too and were weeping as they went up.”

A consciousness of ill-desert has a tendency to reconcile us to the afflictions with which our sins are visited. In some respect indeed it embitters our trials, which the testimony of a good conscience would alleviate; but in other respects it has a good effect, in that it silences every murmur against the dispensations of a righteous Providence.

The troubles which David had experienced in his family as the punishment of his own sins, had already been great and manifold; but in the rebellion of Absalom they were risen to their height; they were borne however with a spirit of piety suited to his state, and worthy of his high character.

Let us consider,

I. The circumstances in which David was placed.

David’s circumstances were most afflictive.

He was now driven from his throne, banished from the ordinances of religion, and in danger of immediate destruction.

Now considering him as a man, such adversity must be painful in the extreme; and still more when we recollect that he was a king, and therefore susceptible of pain in proportion to the degradation which he suffered.

But view him as a king, and then how distressing must it be to see his country involved in civil war, and to be himself on the eve of a bloody engagement with thousands of his own subjects!

View him also as a man of piety, driven from the ordinances of religion, and suffering under the rebukes of an offended God; what can be conceived more distressing than such a state as his?

David’s circumstances derived ten-fold poignancy from the source from whence they flowed.

The people that inflicted these wounds were his own subjects. Had he been attacked by foreign enemies, he would have gone forth against them with alacrity; but to be constrained to fight with those over whom he had reigned so many years, in whose defense he had so often exposed his own life, and for whose benefit he had labored all his days—this filled him with the deepest grief! Psalm 55:1-8 with Zechariah 13:6.

But among the insurgents was his own peculiar friend Ahithophel, from whose counsel and assistance he might have derived the greatest benefit. How keenly he felt this disappointment, we learn from the lamentation he poured out on this memorable occasion, Psalm 55:12-14; and who that has known the sweets of friendship must not sympathize with him?

But the bitterest ingredient in his cup was, that it was mixed for him by his own son; that son, whom he had so recently, and so undeservedly received to favor, and in whose professions of piety he had begun to rejoice, 2 Samuel 15:7-9. As the most exalted joys, so also the acutest sorrows, flow from those who stand to us in the relation of children; and in proportion as this worthless son was beloved by him, was the anguish occasioned by his rebellious conduct.

The insulting language of Shimei was of no account in the mind of David; that he was willing to bear, 2 Samuel 16:5-11; but to be so treated by his beloved Absalom, was a grief almost insupportable, verse 30. And we doubt not but that every tender parent will readily understand how greatly such a consideration must have overwhelmed his mind.

Let us next proceed to notice,

II. David’s conduct under those circumstances.

Zadok and Abiathar had brought to him the ark, judging that it must be a comfort and a benefit to him to have access to God under his heavy trials. But David ordered them to carry back the ark, being himself prepared for every event, inasmuch as he enjoyed in his own soul,

1. David showed a confidence in God’s care.

David well knew that God’s presence was not confined to the ark, nor his agency necessarily connected with it. He knew that wherever his enemies might drive him, God’s ear would be open to his prayer, and his arm be extended for his relief. Hence, though he honored the ark as the symbol of God’s presence, he did not confide in it; but trusted in God, who was represented by it. He knew that, if God should be on his side, the efforts of his enemies would be all in vain; and that, however threatening their aspect at the present, he would in due time be brought back again in safety.

Such is the confidence which God’s people should maintain under all the trials which they may be called to endure. “The name of God is a strong tower to which they may run!” and in which they may defy their bitterest enemies. “If God is for them—then none can be against them;” “nor can any weapon that is formed against them prosper.” It is the privilege of every saint to know that his affairs are in God’s hands; and that as nothing can be done but by divine permission, so nothing shall be done which shall not work for his spiritual and eternal good. The language of his soul therefore should at all times be, “The Lord is on my side; I will not fear what man can do unto me”.

2. David showed a submission to God’s will.

What God might have ordained respecting him, David did not know; nor was he curious to inquire; but, whatever might be the outcome of his present afflictions, he was contented and satisfied. He well knew that he deserved all that God could lay upon him; and he was ready to say, “I will bear the indignation of the Lord, because I have sinned against him! Micah 7:9.” This is one fruit of sin, if I may so speak; or rather, of that humiliation which accompanies true repentance. We become reconciled to whatever affliction God may send, seeing that any chastisement in this world must be less than our iniquities have deserved. O that in the prospect of the heaviest calamities, we might have such a view of our ill desert, as should dispose us humbly to commit ourselves into God’s hands, and cordially to welcome every trial which his all-wise providence may appoint for us! Under every affliction, our acquiescence should be like that of Eli, “It is the Lord, let him do what seems good to him.”

Charles Simeon

2 Samuel 15:25-26

Then the king said to Zadok, “Take the ark of God back into the city. If I find favor in the LORD’s eyes, he will bring me back and let me see it and his dwelling place again. But if he says, ‘I am not pleased with you,’ then I am ready; let him do to me whatever seems good to him.”

Sin, though forgiven, rarely passes unpunished in this present world; on the contrary, God marks his indignation against it here, in order to embitter it the more to the offender who has committed it, and to endear to him the more, that mercy which has been exercised towards him.

At the very time that he forgave the sin of David, he declared to the pardoned penitent, that the sword should never pass from his house, even to the last hour. Accordingly we find, that David was afflicted in no common degree in his own family; and in such a way as strongly to bring his sins to his remembrance.

He had dishonored the wife of his friend Uriah; and his own son Amnon violates his daughter Tamar.

He had contrived and accomplished the death of Uriah; and his son Absalom contrived and accomplished the death of his own brother Amnon.

He had dishonored God in the face of the whole world; and he himself is driven with scorn and infamy from his throne.

Yet, though in this respect a monument of God’s displeasure, he was now living near to God, in the exercise of all holy duties and heavenly affections. At no period of his life was grace more in exercise within him, as appears from the spirit which he manifested under his afflictions.

To exhibit this spirit in its true colors, and to make a suitable improvement of it for our own souls, is the scope and object of our present discourse.

I. Mark his spirit and conduct under his afflictions.

To two points in particular the text calls our attention:

1. His reverence for God.

David having suddenly fled from Jerusalem in order to escape from the sword of Absalom, Zadok and the Levites brought forth the ark to David, that he might be able in this emergency to consult it. But David ordered Zadok to carry it back; for, though nothing in the world was so desirable to him as the presence of God, he regarded this measure as highly unwise.

It was unauthorized; and therefore wrong. That sacred symbol of the Deity was not to be moved about according to the wishes or conceits of men. In the wilderness it had never moved, but as the pillar and the cloud, in which the Deity resided, led the way. And to dispose of it in this manner, without any direction from God, was such an act of impious presumption as he dared not to commit. He well remembered the rebuke which he himself had met with, when, with the best intentions, he had moved the ark without attending to the forms prescribed by God himself; allowing it to be drawn in a cart by oxen, instead of carrying it on the shoulders of the Levites; for the smiting of Uzzah was a testimony of God’s displeasure against him for his inattention, no less than against Uzzah himself for his presumption, 1 Chronicles 15:13. He remembered too the judgments inflicted on above fifty thousand men of Bethshemesh for daring to look into the ark, 1 Samuel 6:19; and therefore he trembled at the thought of acting towards it with irreverence or indiscretion.

It was also unnecessary. He knew by experience that God’s presence was not confined to the ark; but that he was accessible to his people at all times, and in all places. Often had he, when driven out from Jerusalem by Saul, made known his requests in prayer to God, and obtained from him the most gracious answers; and therefore he doubted not but that God would still continue to him, his gracious communications in the time of need, notwithstanding the absence of that symbol, through which, under other circumstances, he ought to have been approached.

It was moreover unavailing. What could the ark do, unless accompanied by God himself? What had it done for Israel when taken from Shiloh to protect them against the Philistines? Of itself it had no power; and therefore it was taken prisoner by the Philistines, while those who carried it were slain, 1 Samuel 4:11. And what if this unauthorized measure should lead to a similar result? How could he ever lift up his head again, after having brought such dishonor upon God?

It was impious. What was this, but to transfer to a creature the attributes of Deity, and to expect from, the ark the help which could proceed from God alone? This would have been to provoke God to jealousy, and to excite his displeasure at the very time that he most needed his favor.

On these grounds David sent back the ark; and humbly committed his cause into the hands of his invisible but almighty Protector.

2. His submission to God.

Exceedingly heavy were the afflictions of David at this time. He was driven from his throne; in hourly danger of being destroyed with all his faithful attendants; and this through the ambition and cruelty of his favorite son. Forsaken by some of his most endeared friends, and loaded with curses by his envenomed enemies—he fled in the most disconsolate state that can be imagined. Hear the pathetic account given of him in the following context, “David went up by the ascent of Mount Olivet, and wept as he went up, and had his head covered; and he went barefoot. And all the people that were with him covered every man his head; and they went up, weeping as they went up, verse 30.”

But his afflictions were great, no less in a spiritual than in a temporal view. Indeed it is in this view that he chiefly complains of them throughout the Psalms. See Psalm 42:1-5; Psalm 42:10; Psalm 43:3-4; Psalm 84:1-4.

But in the midst of all, he submitted meekly to the painful dispensation, leaving it to God to order for him whatever in his wisdom he should see fit. He knew that, if God should interpose in his behalf, all should end in a good outcome, and he should yet again worship God in his sanctuary; but, if God had ordained otherwise, he was prepared to kiss the rod, and to bless the hand that chastised him with it. “If I find favor in the LORD’s eyes, he will bring me back and let me see it and his dwelling place again. But if he says, ‘I am not pleased with you,’ then I am ready; let him do to me whatever seems good to him.”

In all this he was doubtless actuated by a sense of his own extreme unworthiness; he saw that the affliction which was laid upon him, was an accomplishment of the threatening long ago denounced against him by God himself, and “he received it as the punishment of his iniquity.” At the same time, assured in his own mind that all of the trials of believers are the chastening strokes were inflicted by a loving Father, and not by an avenging Judge—he desired only that God should glorify himself in any way which he saw best, “I was silent; I would not open my mouth, for you are the one who has done this! Psalm 39:9.”

Do not confine your views to David, but,

II. Improve the subject for the benefit of your own souls.

1. See here the sufferings of that Savior whom he typified.

David was a most remarkable type of Christ, no less in his sufferings, than in his exaltation to the throne of Israel. In all the Psalms where he speaks of his sufferings, David speaks quite as much in the person of the Messiah as in his own person. See Psalms 22, 69. Even where he seems most exclusively to refer to his own case, he is quoted by Paul as pre-eminently typifying the Lord Jesus, “Innumerable evils have compassed me about; my iniquities have taken hold upon me, that I am not able to look up; they are more than the hairs of my head; therefore my heart fails me.” Doubtless these words, as far as they relate to Christ, speak of him only as bearing the sins of others, while David suffered only for his own sins; but the whole Psalm is in a very peculiar degree descriptive of the Lord Jesus. Compare Psalm 40:6-8 with Hebrews 10:5-9.

Behold Jesus then as cast out by his whole nation, who said, “We will not have this man to reign over us! verse 23 with John 18:1.”

Behold Jesus forsaken by his own Disciples whom he loved, and betrayed by one who had eaten bread with him, even by Judas, who was actually typified by Ahithophel, Psalm 41:9 with John 13:18.

Behold Jesus going over that very brook Kedron, John 18:1, pursued by armed bands, John 18:3, who sought and labored to destroy him!

Behold more particularly Jesus’ deportment under his afflictions. Here was David pre-eminently a type of Him. When the bitter cup was put into his hands, though he prayed for the removal of it, he said, “Not my will, but may your will be done.”

When loaded with execrations, as David was by Shimei, he submitted meekly to the insults, as the Apostle says, “When he was reviled, he reviled not again; when he suffered, threatened not; but committed himself to Him who judges righteously.”

As David too was chiefly solicitous for the welfare of the very man who sought his life, (giving express charge to all to spare the life of Absalom,) so did our blessed Lord pray and plead for his murderers, “Father, forgive them! For they know not what they do.”

Thus while you admire the spirit and conduct of David, you may well take occasion to admire the infinitely sublimer spirit of the Lord Jesus.

2. Look to Jesus as an example under any sufferings which you yourselves may be called to bear.

This is the improvement which an inspired Apostle teaches us to make of the subject, “Take, my brethren,” says James, “the prophets who have spoken in the name of the Lord, for an example of suffering affliction, and of patience.” We ourselves are all exposed to sufferings, even as David was; for “we are born to trouble, as the sparks fly upward;” nor do we know how soon troubles may come upon us.

The possession of a crown was no exemption to suffering, to David; nor can any situation, in which we may be, prove an exemption to suffering to us. The more secure we are in our own apprehension, the more reason we have to expect that some calamity is near at hand. The saying, “My mountain stands strong; I shall not be moved;” will be a prelude to the hiding of God’s face, and the incursion of some heavy trouble, Psalm 30:6-7.

The very things to which we looked for comfort, may become an occasion of the bitterest anguish! Absalom was considered as the most handsome youth in all Israel, and no doubt had often been looked upon by David with inexpressible delight; yet this was the man who assassinated his brother and dethroned his father. And thus it is often found, at this day, that the objects of our fondest delight, may become the sources of our bitterest afflictions!

Are we oppressed with severe trials? Let us commit our cause to God with meek submission and with humble trust. Let us see the hand of God in our trials, and view men only as his instruments, raised up by him to fulfill and execute his will, Psalm 17:13; Isaiah 10:5; Isaiah 10:15. Let us view the actions of men and devils only as the axe or saw in the hand of God; and, under a sense of our own extreme unworthiness, let us “receive evil at the Lord’s hands as well as good,” and “bless him” equally for whatever God ordains for us in his wise and gracious providence! Job 1:21.

3. Seek a kingdom from which you can never be dispossessed.

David was at that time the mightiest monarch upon earth; yet how soon, and how easily, was he dispossessed of his throne. To what then can we look as stable and permanent? Alas! like Shebna, we may in an instant be cast out from all that we possess, even as a stone is cast out from a sling, Isaiah 22:15-19. But there is “a kingdom which cannot be moved,” and “against which the gates of Hell shall not prevail.” This is the inheritance which our Lord Jesus Christ will give to all who truly believe in him. Of this David was secure; and therefore he regarded not the loss of an earthly kingdom; but willingly submitted to it, if God had so ordained. You must likewise secure a portion that is out of the reach of any enemies. Have God for your friend; and you need not care who is your enemy! For “if God is for you, then none can effectually be against you.” You may look with delight on the gathering storm, and defy all the powers of earth and Hell to hurt you. So did David in Psalm 46:1-3. So did Paul in Romans 8:35-39. And so may the least and weakest of of believers.”Fear not little flock; for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom! Luke 12:32.” Once possessed of that, “all tears shall be wiped away from your eyes forever! Revelation 21:3-4.”

Charles Simeon

2 Samuel 13:15

“Then Amnon hated her with intense hatred. In fact, he hated her more than he had loved her. Amnon said to her, “Get up and get out!”

The Word of God will surely be fulfilled in due season; and every threatening in it, as well as every promise, will be accomplished. God had, with most astonishing mercy, so far pardoned the iniquity of David, as to remit all punishment of it in the eternal world; but, as his sin had produced a public scandal, and had caused the name of God to be blasphemed through the land, God warned him by Nathan that he should be visited with troubles through life; with troubles in his own family, not unlike to those which he himself had brought on the family of Uriah.

Accordingly we find that these troubles speedily commenced. His eldest son Amnon, the heir to his throne, developed an immoral desire after his half-sister Tamar; and so violent was his passion, that his health was visibly impaired by it. By the advice of his friend Jonadab, he laid a plan for getting her within his reach; and then, when she would not consent to his wicked purposes, he effected them by force. But no sooner had he accomplished his wishes, than his love was turned into a most inveterate hatred; insomuch that, as our text informs us, “the hatred with which he hated her was greater than the love with which he had loved her.” Now this change of his mind gives us a deep insight into human nature; and affords us occasion for many profitable remarks upon,

I. The “love” of the ungodly.

As it is not our design to dwell more than is necessary on the particular event that is here recorded, we shall consider personal attachment as comprehending both love and friendship. Now love, in this extended sense, may exist in a very high degree where there is no religious principle; it may even in some respects vie with the most exalted instances that are to be found in the Church of God; with the love of Jacob to Rachel, for the sake of whom seven years of servitude appeared but as a few days, Genesis 29:20; and with the friendship that subsisted between David and Jonathan, whose love for each other exceeded even the love of women, 2 Samuel 1:25-26. But it must be confessed, that far the greater part of that which passes for love and friendship in the world, is unsound; and that even the best of it is very defective. For the elucidating of this point we shall show,

1. The criminality of that “love” which is evil.

Behold that “love” which is spoken of in our text; it was exceeding ardent—but it was selfish, cruel, and impious. It had respect to nothing but personal gratification. It sought that gratification at the expense of the honor, the interest, the happiness of the object beloved; and it trampled under foot every law whether human or divine.

In the case before us this is plain and obvious; and it will be found that very much of that which is called love and friendship, is of precisely the same stamp and character. It is scarcely needful to advert to that which issues in the seduction of innocence, and a dereliction of the seduced object to all the horrors of infamy and want; yet, how many thousands, of the lower classes especially, have reason to deplore and execrate the existence of such love, among their family, their friends, or their acquaintances! Nor is the friendship of innumerable classes both in higher and lower life unlike to this.

Behold the gambler; he has his “friends” to whom he is strongly attached, not for any valuable qualities in them, but because they administer to his pleasure; but so cruel is his attachment, that if he can win from them all that they possess, he will gladly do it, though he thereby reduce both them and their families to the lowest ebb of misery and ruin.

In like manner the people that unite for what is called conviviality and merry-making; what are these, but confederates against the God of Heaven and earth, associated together to encourage one another in a contempt of his majesty, and a violation of his laws! If men unite for the purposes of plunder, or in resistance to the constituted authorities of the land, we conceive that we do them no injustice, when we speak of them as thieves or rebels; nor will God designate by any gentler terms the union of those who uphold one another in a systematic opposition to his holy will. Whatever is the particular line of conduct they pursue, whether the more flagrant one of open licentiousness, or the more approved one of sober sensuality, their love is selfish, because it centers in self; it is cruel, because it seeks its own ends without regard to the happiness of others; and it is impious, because it is a conspiracy to banish God from the world.

2. The deficiency of that “love” which is good.

Nothing is more honorable than virtuous love, nor anything more delightful than friendship founded on virtuous principles. But still if the attachment is merely that which springs from natural affections, it is defective—it is defective in its foundation, its exercise, its continuance.

That cannot be perfect which has not piety for its basis. Our love to each other should spring from our love to God, and have respect to his image in the person beloved. The person’s conformity to God’s mind and will should be the reason, and the measure, of our love to him. Where this is not the case, the union will be in danger of being dissolved by that very thing which ought most powerfully to cement it. If one of the parties becomes pious, the change will only produce alienation of heart in him whose attachment was founded on natural qualities or attainments; the correspondence of sentiment which is essential to love will have ceased; and the most ardent affection will from thenceforth either be changed into hatred, or subside into cold respect.

As the foundation of merely natural attachments is defective, so also is the exercise; for how can our love aim at the spiritual welfare of its object, when we ourselves have no spiritual sensibility? We may do much, and suffer much, for the temporal happiness of those we love; but we shall retard, rather than advance, whatever could conduce to the good of his soul. How miserably defective then must such attachment be, when, instead of promoting, it obstructs the most valuable ends of life!

Nor is it possible, in the very nature of things, for such attachments to continue beyond the present state of existence. The righteous have a prospect beyond the grave. As a river gliding sweetly through its banks is separated at last by an intervening pier, and then flows in renewed union to the ocean to part no more, so do the godly pass their days together in sweet communion, until separated for a moment by death; they meet again in the future world, to spend an eternity together in unfading bliss.

But no such prospect opens to the worldly man; however happy he may be in his love or friendship, his views are bounded by the narrow limits of this present world.

We might add too, that even in this world its continuance is most uncertain; for where religion does not reign in the heart, and form the basis of our affection, the attachment is liable to be easily interrupted, and speedily dissolved; and it is but too often found, that when the object ceases, through illness or poverty, to administer the usual satisfaction, then attachment languishes, and gives way to indifference and neglect.

Intimately connected with this subject is,

II. The hatred of the wicked.

That men should hate those who injure them, will not create in us any surprise; but that they should hate those whom they have injured, and because they have injured them, may seem strange indeed; but this is really the common course of human events. The instance recorded in our text is worthy of particular notice. The injury which Amnon had done to Tamar was beyond measure great; and, if his love underwent any change at all, we might well suppose that it would give way to pity and compassion. But behold, instead of harboring any tender emotions towards her, he was instantly inflamed with the most inveterate resentment; insomuch that, as ardent as his love had been, his hatred now far exceeded it. But this change was founded in human nature, and was precisely such as injustice is calculated to produce.

1. We hate those whom we have injured, because we have debased ourselves in their esteem.

We all affect the esteem of our fellow-creatures; and it is well to do so, “a good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, and loving favor rather than silver and gold, Proverbs 22:1.” While we are unconscious of having done anything to forfeit a person’s esteem, we conclude, as a matter of course, that we possess it; but when we are sensible that we have injured him in any respect, we feel that we have suffered loss in his esteem; and this loss we resent as an injury done to ourselves.

It is common for people so to expose themselves to censure by their follies, as to render the society in which they mix, and even the town or village in which they live, disgustful to them; and they hate all the people whose censure they have incurred, for no other reason than because they have seen and noticed the improprieties of their conduct. Their pride is wounded; and they impute that to the malignity of others, which they should ascribe rather to their own folly.

Thus it is with respect to injuries of every kind; we feel that the commission of them lessens our character in the eyes of him whom we have injured; and not having any suitable humiliation in our own souls, we impute that to malignity in him, which is the sole fruit of our injustice!

2. We hate those whom we have injured, because we have enabled him to lower us in the estimation of others.

We can easily go to sleep in sin, provided our iniquity is unknown; but a discovery of it fills us with the most pungent grief. Now if we have injured any person, we have put ourselves in the power of that person, so that he can inflict upon us the severest wounds, by exposing our conduct to public reprehension. Some indeed there are who care but little about their character, and who are therefore indifferent whether their conduct is exposed or not; but, where character is dear to a man, and he has done anything which would involve him in much disgrace, there his hatred will proportionably rise against the person that is privy to his shame.

We cannot find a more striking instance of this than in the history of David. He had injured his friend Uriah in the basest manner; and used all possible methods to conceal his shame. Having failed in these, he found that Uriah must of necessity before long discover the injury he had received; and therefore he longed for Uriah’s death; yes, he actually laid a snare for his life, and was delighted to hear that he had successfully attained his murderous object.

We are far from saying that every man’s resentment would carry him to this length, even where the same grounds for it existed; but we have no doubt, that there are some who, in similar circumstances, would not rejoice to hear that the person whom he had injured was dead; all concern about his life would be swallowed up in the hope of concealing his own shame, and retaining an unblemished character before men.

3. We hate those whom we have injured, because we conceive him to be our enemy.

It is natural to suppose that those whom we have injured are our enemies; and that consideration is quite sufficient to excite hatred in the bosom of an unjust man. Hence Solomon observes, “A lying tongue hates those that are afflicted by it, Proverbs 26:28.” Indeed it is from this consideration that men hate the Scriptures, and even God himself; they know that the Scriptures are against them, and that God is displeased with them; and therefore “they hate the light, and will not come to the light, lest their deeds should be reproved.” Yes, they say, “Make the Holy One of Israel to cease from before us;” or, as the fool in his heart, “I wish there were no God! Isaiah 30:11; Psalm 14:1.” In like manner they hate pious ministers also, as Ahab did, “I hate Micaiah, because he does not speak good concerning me, but evil.”

While we suppose that men love us, there is no difficulty in loving them; the vilest of sinners will do this. But when we think that our persons or our characters are odious to others, it requires much grace to feel a loving spirit towards them; a grace which no ungodly man can exercise, nor any unjust man possess. Resentment is the only fruit which human nature, so circumstanced, will produce.

Many valuable lessons may be learned from this subject; we may see in particular:

1. The importance of cultivating a pious principle.

Had Amnon felt the power of religion in his soul, he would have withstood the first impulse of his desire, and said, “How shall I do this great wickedness, and sin against God?” Or, if he had been overcome with the temptation, he would at least have sought to repair the injury he had done, and not have aggravated it by such cruel treatment. But, being destitute of all pious principles, he was the sport of every lust, and was driven from one extreme to another, as a leaf before the wind.

Just so, what can we expect, but to be equally unstable, though we should not commit exactly the same enormities as he? Yes; nothing but a pious principle will keep us firm. If we have the fear of God in our hearts, we shall “stand in awe, and not sin,” even though we know that our iniquity will not be discovered by mortal eyes; and if we have the love of Christ in our hearts, that will constrain us to live to him, in a holy conformity to his will, and in a cheerful obedience to his commands.

2. The importance of associating with pious friends.

Had Jonadab been pious, he would have instantly endeavored to divert Amnon from his purpose; but, being himself an ungodly man, he offered himself as a panderer to Amnon’s lusts, and suggested to him the plan whereby he might obtain the gratification he desired. Thus was he, in fact, the instrument whereby these horrid impieties were accomplished. Thus it is with ungodly companions at all times; instead of hindering evil, they will encourage it, and facilitate the execution of it to the uttermost.

Knowing then, as we do, how apt we are to imbibe the spirit of our friends, should we not be careful with whom we associate? Should we not select our friends from the wise and good, rather than from among the giddy and profane? “He who walks with wise men,” says Solomon, “will be wise; but a companion of fools shall be destroyed! Proverbs 13:20.” Let us remember that Do not be misled: “Bad company corrupts good character! 1 Corinthians 15:33;” and let us choose those for our associates in this world, whom we shall wish to dwell with in the world to come.

3. The importance of setting a pious example.

We cannot but trace, in some degree at least, the wickedness of Amnon to the sad example which David had set for him. Amnon would be ready to excuse his own conduct towards Tamar, in comparison with David towards Bathsheba and Uriah. “At all events,” he would say, “my father cannot be very severe in censuring me, when he recollects what he himself has done.”

In like manner, if we give the world occasion to reproach us, we shall lose all weight and influence in reproving them. Yes, we shall harden them in their iniquities, and encourage them to vindicate themselves from our example.

Let parents, and masters, and all that are in authority, bear this in mind, that one bad act of theirs will do more to endorse sin, than ten good admonitions will do to repress it. Let religious professors in particular remember it; for if they cast a stumbling-block before men, they will be accountable to God for all the evil that ensues!

Methinks, in this, and in many subsequent events, David could not but see the sad fruit of his own iniquities; and that very consideration would add ten-fold poignancy to all his grief!

Just so, many parents may find in the conduct of their children the severest reprehension for their own neglects. Let us guard against all such occasion for self-reproach; and endeavor so to act, that we may be able to say to all around us, “Whatever you have seen and heard in me, do; and the God of peace shall be with you.”

Charles Simeon

2 Samuel 12:13

Then David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the LORD.”

Nathan replied, “The LORD has taken away your sin. You are not going to die.”

It is scarcely to be conceived to what a degree sin will blind the eyes, and harden the heart! We see indeed that the ungodly world will commit every species of iniquity without either shame or remorse; but who would imagine that a person enlightened, renewed, and sanctified by the Spirit of God, should in the space of a few days be reduced by sin to a state of utter obduracy? Yet such was the change which one single temptation speedily effected on him who was “the man after God’s own heart.”

The circumstances of David’s crime are so well known, that they need not at present to be enlarged upon. But his long impenitence, his apparent forgetfulness of his horrid deeds, and his excessive severity against a man whose fault bore no proportion to his own, are less noticed; though they cannot fail to strike every one who reads the account of his conversation with Nathan. By an apposite and well-wrought parable, the Prophet Nathan had led David inadvertently to pass sentence against himself; and then availed himself of the opportunity to charge home upon him the crimes he had perpetrated. Then it was, and not until then, that David felt a just sense of his guilt; though nine months at least had elapsed since his criminal immorality with Bathsheba—yet his conscience had slept, until it was now awakened to perform its office. On this occasion he confessed his sin to Nathan; and received from Nathan a consolatory assurance, that his iniquity, as heinous as it was, was pardoned.

There are two points to which the text directs our attention;

I. David’s humiliation.

There does not at first sight appear anything worthy of notice in David’s confession; but, if we examine it carefully, we shall find in it several things which indicated a deep and true repentance.

1. David acknowledged his sin as an offence against God.

The evil of sin in this view is generally overlooked; and the quality of actions is appreciated and determined by their effects on society. Hence the offences which are committed solely against God, such as unbelief, impenitence, self-righteousness, and the like—are never condemned by the world, or even considered as blemishing the moral character at all; while such crimes as theft and perjury render a man universally execrated and abhorred. But it is from its relation to God that sin derives its principal malignity; its chief heinousness consists in its being:

a violation of God’s law,

a contempt of his authority, and

a practical denial of all his attributes.

If any sin whatever could deserve to be marked with superior infamy on other considerations, it would surely be the crimes which David had committed; yet, in adverting to these very actions, David passes over their criminality in relation to man, and notices them only as offences against God! See Psalm 51:4.

Joseph’s views of sin perfectly agreed with those of David. See Genesis 39:9. This shows that he had just views of his conduct; and that the grounds of his humiliation were precisely such as the occasion required.

2. David made no attempt to extenuate his guilt.

Unhumbled people uniformly endeavor to palliate their faults.

Adam cast the blame of his transgression on Eve; and Eve transferred it to the serpent, Genesis 3:12-13.

Saul, when reproved for sparing Agag and the chief of the spoil, shifted the blame from himself upon the people; and, as far as it still attached to him, excused himself as acting involuntarily, and as overawed by the people, 1 Samuel 15:15; 1 Samuel 15:24.

But David’s mouth was shut; he uttered not one single word in extenuation of his crimes; as heavy as Nathan’s charge against him was, he fell under it. This was another excellent proof of his penitence and contrition; and it is certain that wherever real humiliation is, the penitent will be more ready to aggravate his guilt, than to palliate and excuse it.

3. David manifested no displeasure against his reprover.

Men in general, and great men in particular, are very apt to take offence when told of their faults. They think themselves at liberty to insult God as much as they please; but no one must take the liberty to maintain the cause of God in opposition to them. Some indeed have been found, in different ages, who have ventured to speak with faithfulness to monarchs; but they have always done it at the peril of their lives. See 1 Kings 13:4; 1 Kings 21:20; 1 Kings 22:8 and 2 Kings 1:9 and 2 Chronicles 16:10; and frequently have paid the penalty of death for their presumption, 2 Chronicles 24:21; 2 Chronicles 25:16 and Matthew 14:3-5; Matthew 14:10.

But in the present instance no displeasure at all was manifested; on the contrary, we have reason to think that Nathan was more endeared to David than ever by his fidelity, since David afterwards called one of his own children by the prophet’s name, 2 Samuel 5:14; and showed confidence in him to the last hour of his life, 1 Kings 1:24; 1 Kings 1:27; 1 Kings 1:32-34. In this therefore we have a further evidence of the sincerity and depth of David’s repentance.

4. David was willing to take shame to himself even before men.

There is nothing which men will not do in order to conceal their guilt from men! They will “add iniquity to iniquity,” and perpetrate murder itself, in order to avoid the shame to which their crimes have exposed them. How keenly was Saul affected by Samuel’s refusal to honor him before the people! The dread of that public dishonor pained him more than all the denunciations of God’s wrath! 1 Samuel 15:25-30.

But the reproaches of men, however severe, were of no account in David’s eyes; that which pained him was, that he had given occasion for those reproaches, and that God would be dishonored by them; and therefore, though he thereby published and perpetuated his own shame, he wrote some of his penitential Psalms, and set them to music for the use of penitents in that and all succeeding ages. Being “vile in his own eyes,” it was a matter of small concern to him that he was vile also in the eyes of others. He loathed and “abhorred himself,” and therefore submitted readily to be abhorred by others.

The truth of his repentance being manifest, we proceed to notice,

II. His acceptance with God, consequent upon his repentance.

Very remarkable was the answer of the prophet to the royal penitent:

1. David’s acceptance with God was immediate.

There was no interval of time between the confession of David and the reply of Nathan. The very instant that David repented, God forgave him. This is particularly noticed by David himself as a marvelous expression of God’s love and mercy, “I said, I will confess my transgressions unto the Lord; and you forgave the iniquity of my sin, Psalm 32:5.” We would have expected that God would suspend his forgiveness, until David should have evinced the truth of his repentance by a subsequent life of piety; but “God’s ways and thoughts are not like ours; yes rather, they are as much above ours as the heavens are above the earth! Isaiah 55:8-9.”

God acts in a way worthy of himself. His grace is his own, to dispose of according to his sovereign will; and he dispenses it to whoever, and in whatever way, he sees fit. He shows, if we may so speak, peculiar pleasure in manifesting his compassion towards repenting sinners. He represents himself as falling on the neck of the returning prodigal, and as interrupting his confessions by testimonies of his parental love and pardoning grace. Towards the dying thief also our incarnate God displayed the same readiness to forgive, in that he not only complied with his petition, but far exceeded, without one moment’s hesitation, his most enlarged desires! Luke 23:42-43.

Thus has he given us a practical commentary on his own gracious declarations, and demonstrated, for our comfort, that he is “slow to anger and ready to forgive.”

2. David’s acceptance with God was attested.

Nathan spoke, not as a man who suggested only a surmise or doubtful opinion, but as a prophet who was inspired to declare what God had really done. God did not will that his repenting servant should be kept in suspense; and therefore ordered Nathan to communicate to him the joyful tidings, not that God would put away his sin, but that he had put it away, and that the penal consequences of his transgression would never come upon his soul.

It is thus that God frequently acts towards his people; as he made known to David by his prophet, so he reveals to them by his Spirit, that their iniquities are forgiven, and their sins covered! See Isaiah 6:7; Isaiah 38:17; Zechariah 3:4. He desires not the constrained service of a slave, but the willing and grateful obedience of a child. “Though he cause grief—yet will he have compassion according to the multitude of his mercies, Lamentations 3:32;” and will cause his believing people to enjoy an assured sense of their acceptance with him, Isaiah 12:1 and Romans 8:15-16.

3. David’s acceptance with God was complete.

The sins which David had committed were from that very moment “blotted out as a morning cloud!” Neither his adultery nor his murder, nor one particle of guilt of any kind, was imputed to him. There were indeed some temporal judgments entailed upon him:

the fruit of his adulterous commerce was blasted, and his child stricken with death;

David’s own wives were all defiled publicly by his son Absalom;

and the sword, according to Nathan’s prediction, never departed from his house.

These things however were merely temporal, and were designed as much for the benefit of others as for his correction; they tended to impress on all a sense of the malignity of David’s crimes; and to show that, however God might pity and forgive a sinner—he utterly and unchangeably abhorred sin!

But, notwithstanding these remembrancers of his iniquity, his sin was “cast, as it were, into the very depths of the sea!” as ours also shall be, if we truly repent; nor will God ever remember them against us any more forever! Micah 7:18-19; Hebrews 8:12.

We may learn then from this account,

1. The blessing of a judicious and faithful minister!

The method which Nathan used in order to reach the conscience of David, was extremely judicious; and when he had succeeded in making an interposition, then he commenced a direct confrontation, “You are the man!” Had Nathan been less cautious, he had probably shut the ears of his royal master; and had he been satisfied with offering some vague hints, he would have failed to impress David’s callous mind. But by a happy union of wisdom and fidelity, he gained his point, Proverbs 25:12.

Well was it for David that he had such a prophet in his court; for, without Nathan’s admonitions, David might probably have become more and more obdurate, until he had perished in his sin!

Thus should all esteem themselves highly favored by God, if they have a minister, who, while he fears not the faces of men, has a tender love for their souls. They should gladly listen to his admonitions, and thankfully receive his reproofs; they should make it a continual subject of their prayers, that his Word may come with power to their souls, to awaken them to a sense of sin, and to bring them to the enjoyment of salvation.

2. The boundless extent of God’s mercy!

Who would have conceived it possible that such sins as David’s should be so soon forgiven? But, “as God’s majesty is, so also is his mercy.” “He delights in mercy;” and “waits that he may be gracious unto us.” His message to us is, “Only acknowledge your transgressions that you have sinned against the Lord your God, Jeremiah 3:13.” And for our encouragement he declares, “If any says, I have sinned, and it profited me not; I will deliver him from going down into the pit, and his soul shall see the light, Job 33:27-28.”

Let us then carry all our sins to God. Whether they have been more or less heinous in the sight of men, let us not continue under the guilt of them, when they may be so speedily forgiven. Let us remember, that, in and through Christ, God is reconciled to a guilty world; and that, while “they who cover their sins shall not prosper, whoever confesses and forsakes them shall find mercy! Proverbs 28:13.”

Charles Simeon

2 Samuel 12:1-7

The LORD sent Nathan to David. When he came to him, he said, “There were two men in a certain town, one rich and the other poor. The rich man had a very large number of sheep and cattle, but the poor man had nothing except one little ewe lamb he had bought. He raised it, and it grew up with him and his children. It shared his food, drank from his cup and even slept in his arms. It was like a daughter to him.

“Now a traveler came to the rich man, but the rich man refrained from taking one of his own sheep or cattle to prepare a meal for the traveler who had come to him. Instead, he took the ewe lamb that belonged to the poor man and prepared it for the one who had come to him.”

David burned with anger against the man and said to Nathan, “As surely as the LORD lives, the man who did this deserves to die! He must pay for that lamb four times over, because he did such a thing and had no pity.”

Then Nathan said to David, “You are the man!”

God, in the disposal of his gifts, does not conduct himself by any such laws as are necessary for the regulation of human actions. He is a Sovereign who may deal with his creatures as he pleases, without “giving account to us of any of his matters.” Accordingly we find that sometimes he has exercised a severity beyond what we, with our limited apprehensions, might have expected. At other times he has shown mercy, where we would have expected nothing but the heaviest judgments.

We have lately seen God striking Uzzah dead for a well-meant error, and taking the kingdom from Saul for not waiting quite so long for Samuel as he should have done. But in our text we behold him sending a prophet unto David to bring him to repentance, after the commission of such crimes as cannot be contemplated without horror and amazement. But “His ways are not as our ways, nor his thoughts as our thoughts.”

The conduct of David as portrayed in our text, together with the means used by Nathan to humble him for it, lead us to show,

I. To what an awful extent a man’s conscience may be seared.

We read of people whose “consciences are seared as with a hot iron! 1 Timothy 4:2;” and such was now the state of David.

One would have supposed that, after the commission of adultery with Bathsheba, he would have been scarcely able to endure his existence through the agonies of his mind; but he was only concerned about concealing it from man; accordingly, on finding that her pregnancy must of necessity lead to a discovery of the crime, he adopted various means to deceive Uriah; and when he did not succeed in them, he sent an order to Joab to expose, and to desert, him in battle, so as to ensure his death by the hands of the enemy. One would suppose that such complicated crimes as these should awaken him. Yet behold for nine or ten months he was, as far as appears to us, altogether insensible of his guilt.

At the same time he was quick-sighted enough to the crimes of others, and severe in the extreme against the man, whom Nathan represented as oppressively taking the favorite lamb of a poor neighbor in preference to one out of his own flock; he deemed that man to be worthy of death, because he had shown no pity; and adjudged him to pay four-fold for the injury he had committed.

Who can reflect on this without utter astonishment? That so holy a man as David, who had been so honored of the Lord, and had done so much for the honor of his God, should be left to fall in so grievous a manner, and to lie for so long a time impenitent in his sins!

Who can look upon it, and not weep for him?

Who can look upon it, and not tremble for himself?

But awful as this state of mind appears, it is, alas! too common in this world.

Such enormous crimes indeed as those of David are not common; but who has not committed some evils which ought to have humbled him in the dust before God? Yet who has not continued months, and even years, without ever abasing himself with humiliation and contrition? Who has not shown a strange insensibility with respect to the guilt he has contracted? We can easily discern the faults of others, and can censure them with severity; but towards our own faults we are most blind and most indulgent!

Nor must we be considered here as referring altogether to those who despise religion. It is a common evil, and is even found in the house of God! There are professors of religion who are as blind to their own sins, as if they never had known what sin was; and who, if their misdeeds are unknown to man, continue for years unhumbled in the sight of God! Yes, there are too many, who are both blinded and “hardened by the deceitfulness of sin;” and, if ever God should give them true repentance, they will be as much astonished at their present insensibility, as now they are at that which is recorded in our text.

Seeing then how callous a man’s conscience may become, let us inquire,

II. In what way may the conscience be most successfully excited to perform its office.

Much may be learned from the conduct of Nathan on this occasion:

1. We should endeavor to divest men of the self-love that blinds them.

This was well contrived in the parable that Nathan spoke. David did not see the drift of the parable as relating to himself, and therefore felt no personal interest in his decision. Hence his judgment was free, and his determination of the cause unbiased. Had he been aware that he was about to condemn himself, he would have been far more indulgent towards the offending person.

Now this mode of convicting people, who would have revolted at any plainer dealing, has been frequently practiced with good effect. It was to such an expedient that Joab resorted, in order to prevail on David to recall his son Absalom from banishment, 2 Samuel 14:5-11; 2 Samuel 14:20; and by a similar device a prophet constrained Ahab to condemn himself for sparing Benhadad, whom God had delivered into his hands to be destroyed, 1 Kings 20:35-42. Our Lord himself also frequently adopted the same method of counteracting the prejudices of the Scribes and Pharisees, Matthew 21:40-45.

By such means a person is silenced at once, and is “condemned out of his own mouth.” True indeed, in cases where the mind is open to conviction, these precautions are less necessary; but the sentence that is founded on such grounds is always less offensive, because the criminal passes it upon himself.

2. We should however combine fidelity with confrontation. Sooner or later we must come to the point, “You are the man!” We are to consider ourselves as messengers of the Most High God, who has said, “He who has my word, let him speak my word faithfully, Jeremiah 23:28.” We must not fear the face of man! Our concern for his welfare must swallow up all dread of his displeasure. The consideration of the account which we must one day give to God, must impel us, even at the peril of our lives, to bear a faithful testimony in his service.

Behold the boldness of Elijah in reproving Ahab, 1 Kings 18:17-18; 1 Kings 21:19-21; and of John in condemning the incestuous commerce of Herod, Matthew 14:4. These are the examples which we must follow, when milder methods have proved ineffectual; but our object must always be, not merely to acquit ourselves to God as faithful monitors, but to win the souls of those whom we admonish. The recollection of our own weakness, and proneness to fall, must ever render us as tender as possible towards our fallen brother, “Brothers, if someone is caught in a sin, you who are spiritual should restore him gently. But watch yourself, or you also may be tempted, Galatians 6:1.”

Let us then, in the view of this history, learn,

1. To tremble for ourselves.

Did David fall? Then who then is safe?

Did David sink into such an obdurate state? Then who has not reason to dread lest he be given over to a reprobate mind?

Clear enough it is from whence repentance must proceed, whether in its first commencement, or in its further progress; if God works it not in us by his Holy Spirit, we shall be altogether as insensible as a rock of adamant! Let none of us then indulge a proud security, or imagine ourselves out of the reach of temptation, “Let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall!”

2. To rejoice in God.

O what mercy did God display on this occasion; that instead of cutting off the royal miscreant by some signal judgment, he sent a prophet to awaken his drowsy conscience, and bring him to repentance!

We lament indeed, that many have taken occasion from David’s fall to make light of sin; and from his recovery, to imagine, that God will never execute his threatened judgments; but we have reason to bless our God that such a monument of mercy has been exhibited in the Scriptures.

How many thousands of backsliding Christians have been restored by means of this one example! We are now encouraged to say to all, however heinous their iniquities have been: “Return, O backsliding children; and God will heal your backslidings, and love you freely.” “Only acknowledge your iniquity,” and then “it shall not be your ruin.”

Is there anyone among us who has become hardened in his sins? O, hear what God says to his people of old, “I was enraged by his sinful greed; I punished him, and hid my face in anger, yet he kept on in his willful ways. I have seen his ways, but I will heal him; I will guide him and restore comfort to him, Isaiah 57:17-18; and seek “repentance unto life,” even that “repentance which is not to be repented of.”

Charles Simeon

2 Samuel 7:27

“O LORD Almighty, God of Israel, you have revealed this to your servant, saying, ‘I will build a house for you.’ So your servant has found courage to offer you this prayer.”

If we were to judge from the infinite distance which exists between the Creator and his creatures, and especially between a holy God and sinful man, we should say, it was vain, if not impious, to imagine that any request of ours could enter into the ears of Jehovah, or that he could by any means be induced to notice it with his favorable regards. Indeed, if God had not, of his own sovereign mercy, commanded us to spread our needs before him, and assured us of an answer to our supplications, Beelzebub himself might as well hope for acceptance in prayer, as we. But “God has given us exceeding great and precious promises;” which we may plead with him, just as David pleaded in the passage before us.

David had desired to build a house for the Lord; and Nathan, the prophet, had encouraged him in his purpose. But God, not willing that David, who had shed so much blood, should execute that office, devolved it upon one who should spring from his loins verse 12, 13; at the same time assuring David, that God would make his family to be of long continuance upon his throne, “The Lord tells you that he will make a house for you, verse 11.”

Encouraged by this promise, David poured out his soul before God in prayer, saying, “Now, O Lord God, the word that you have spoken concerning your servant, and concerning his house, establish it forever, and do as you have said verse 25.” Then, apologizing, if I may so speak, for presuming to offer such a prayer, he refers expressly to the promise before specified, and assigns that as the ground on which he had found it in his heart to pray this prayer. Then he goes on, again and again reverting to this in vindication of himself, “And now, O Lord God, you are that God, and your words are true, and you have promised this goodness unto your servant. Therefore, now let it please you to bless the house of your servant, that it may continue forever before you; for you, O Lord God, have spoken it; and with your blessing let the house of your servant be blessed forever! verse 28, 29.”

Now, in speaking upon this subject, I will show,

I. The connection which exists between the promises of God and our prayers.

1. The promises of God are our warrant for asking.

Pardon, peace, holiness, glory! How should it be, that we, sinful creatures, should dare to ask such blessings at God’s hands? But God has promised them all. There is not any one thing that an immortal soul can need, which is not the subject of an express promise in the Word of God. Moreover, he permits his sinful creatures to come to him “as his remembrancers.” By this very name are his suppliant people designated, Isaiah 62:6-7; and every one of them is authorized to spread his promises before him, saying, “Remember your word unto your servant, wherein you have caused me to hope, Psalm 119:49;” and “do unto me as you have said, verses 11, 16.”

2. The promises of God are our security for receiving.

God is altogether immutable, both in his nature, Malachi 3:6; James 1:17, and in his Word, Hebrews 6:17. “Sooner should Heaven and earth pass away, than one jot or tittle of his Word should fail, Matthew 24:35.” As for difficulties, we have nothing to do with them. Sarah sinned in allowing these difficulties to have the least influence upon her mind; for “Is anything too hard for the Lord? Genesis 18:10-14.”

Our confidence cannot possibly be too strong, when we have an express promise to rely upon. We should have this as an abiding principle within us; as a principle which no difficulties whatever should shake, “God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent; has he said, and shall he not do it? or has he spoken, and shall he not make it good? Numbers 23:19.” Never did anyone trust in the Lord, and find himself disappointed of his hope. As Joshua appealed to all Israel, so may we appeal to every believer in the universe, “You know, in all your hearts and in all your souls, that not one thing has failed of all the good things which the Lord your God spoke concerning you. All have come to pass unto you; and not one thing has failed thereof! Joshua 23:14.”

From the example of David I will further point out,

II. Our duty in relation to God’s promises.

1. We must embrace the promises as made over to us in Christ Jesus.

It is “in Christ alone that they are all Yes, and Amen! 2 Corinthians 1:20;” and it is to those only who are in Christ by a living faith, that any of them are made. True, indeed, there are general promises given to those who come to Christ, Matthew 11:28; John 6:37; but we never have any part in them, until we actually perform the conditions on which alone they are given. The Covenant of grace provides for us all that we can ever stand in need of. But we must “lay hold on that covenant,” and on “Jesus the Mediator of that covenant,” before we can possess the blessings of it. Let this not be forgotten. Let us not suppose that we are to obtain mercy in ways of our own devising. We must come to God by Christ; we must plead what Christ has done and suffered for us; we must trust in him alone. There is “no access to God, for any of us, but by Him, John 14:6; Ephesians 2:18;” “nor is there any name but His, whereby any man can be saved, Acts 4:12.”

2. We must treasure the promises up in our minds, in order to plead them before God.

In going to God, we greatly honor him, when we remind him of his promises, and declare our entire dependence on them. See the example of Jacob, who for his power in prayer was surnamed Israel. Genesis 32:24-28. He had been assured, in a dream, that God would be with him in all places, and never leave him until he had fulfilled to him his promises in their fullest extent, Genesis 28:15. Fully twenty years afterwards, Jacob, in a season of great distress, reminded God of this promise, saying, “O God of my father Abraham, and God of my Father Isaac, the Lord which said unto me, Return unto your country and to your kindred, and I will deal well with you; deliver me, I beg you! For you have said, I will surely do you good! Genesis 32:9; Genesis 32:11-12.”

Just so, we should bear in mind the promises which God has given us, and present before him those which are in a more peculiar manner suited to our state. This will give us confidence before God; and it will infallibly secure to us an answer of peace; for “this is the confidence that we have in him, that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us; and, if we know that he hears us, whatever we ask, we know that we have the petitions that we desired of him, 1 John 5:14-15.”

3. We must wait with patience for the fulfillment of God’s promises.

God may not answer, either at the time, or in the manner, that our impatient spirits may wish. But though we may ask of him, we are not to dictate to him. We must wait His time, and leave everything to His disposal. The saints of old “saw the promises afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, Hebrews 11:13.” Thus must we do. Times and seasons must be left to God, who alone knows what will be eventually best for us. If we “have found it in our hearts to pray unto him,” we may be sure of two things; first, that God himself has put it into our hearts to pray; and next, that he therefore put it into our hearts to pray, because it was previously in his heart to give. It is “through faith and patience that we are to inherit the promises, Hebrews 6:12;” and the more dark his dispensations, whether of providence or of grace, may be, the more must we “hold fast our confidence in him,” saying, “Though he slays me—yet will I trust in him! Job 13:15.”

Charles Simeon

2 Samuel 7:18-19

Then King David went in and sat before the LORD, and he said: “Who am I, O Sovereign LORD, and what is my family, that you have brought me this far? And as if this were not enough in your sight, O Sovereign LORD, you have also spoken about the future of the house of your servant. Is this your usual way of dealing with man, O Sovereign LORD?”

It is a great comfort to reflect that the dispositions of our hearts are noticed by God, and, if good, are well-pleasing in his sight. There are many holy desires and purposes which we are not able to accomplish; which yet are accepted before God, as much as if they had been carried into effect.

David had conceived a wish and determination to build a house for God, in order that the ark, which was the symbol of the divine presence, might no more dwell within curtains, while he himself was dwelling in a house of cedar. But God did not allow him to execute his purpose, on account of his having shed much blood in war, 1 Chronicles 22:8; nevertheless he commended the desire (“you did well that it was in your heart, 1 Kings 8:18.”) and made it an occasion of discovering to him the honor that was to be conferred on him and his posterity. Struck with the majesty and condescension of God, David went in before him, and burst forth into these expressions of devoutest adoration. We shall show,

I. What grounds David had for gratitude and thanksgiving.

Though David was not allowed to gratify his own inclinations in the particular before mentioned—yet he found abundant cause of thankfulness in,

1. The mercies already given to him.

He had been taken from a very low employment, verse 8; chosen in preference, not only to all his own family, but also to the whole nation; preserved in the midst of numberless dangers; exalted in due season to the throne prepared for him; made victorious over all his enemies; and brought to a state of unrivaled power, affluence, and prosperity, verse 9. On a review of these mercies, he could not but be astonished at the divine goodness to him, or refrain from proclaiming it with rapturous admiration.

2. The mercies yet further promised to him.

God had promised that he would have a son, on whom the honor of building a temple should be conferred; yes, moreover, that the Messiah also should spring from his loins, and sit upon his throne forever and ever, verse 12-14 with Hebrews 1:5. In comparison with this, David observes that all his personal advancement was “but a light matter;” and then, as utterly at a loss to express his sense of the divine goodness, he exclaims, “Is this the manner of man, O Lord God?” Is this the way in which mean and worthless men, such as he felt himself to be, are treated by their fellow-creatures? See 1 Chronicles 17:17. No; it is peculiar to God, who magnifies his own sovereignty in conferring the richest benefits on the most unworthy of mankind!

But however distinguished a favorite of Heaven David was,

II. We have still greater reason for gratitude and thanksgiving.

Let us view our obligations to God,

1. Our general obligations.

As creatures, we were originally formed of the dust of the earth; yet, though so base in our original, we were distinguished above the whole creation by having a rational and immortal soul breathed into us, and a capacity given us to know, to love, to serve, and to enjoy God. Let any one of the human race reflect on this, and say, whether he has not reason to adore the goodness of God, who has given him powers so infinitely superior to any that are possessed by the brute creation, and faculties that shall enjoy eternal blessedness. Let but this elevation of our nature be considered, and we shall exclaim, with profoundest reverence, “Who am I, O Lord God, that you have brought me hitherto?”

As sinners, we have still further ground for praise. We are by nature base; but by practice we have been inexpressibly vile. Yet when we were deserving of nothing but his wrath, God loved us, and gave his own Son to die for us.

Further, when we were even trampling on the blood that was shed for us, he sent his Spirit to reveal his Son in our hearts, and both to fit us for his glory, and to bring us safely to the possession of it.

And “is this the manner of man, O Lord God?” Man selects those who are great and worthy, in order to bestow on them his richest favors; but God, in choosing us, “has lifted the beggar from the dunghill, to set him among princes, and to make him inherit a throne of glory! 1 Samuel 2:8.” O what marvelous condescension is this! and what gratitude does it demand at our hands! “Who is a God like unto you! Exodus 15:11.”

2. Our particular obligations, as compared with David.

In no respect are the obligations here specified to be put in competition with those given to us. Was he chosen from the base estate of a shepherd? Look at the state from which God has chosen us. We were fallen, guilty, hell-deserving creatures, utterly incapable of ever restoring ourselves to his favor; yet did God set his love upon us, and elevate us, not to an earthly throne, but to a crown and kingdom in Heaven itself! And not from earthly enemies, such as David had to encounter, has he preserved us, but from all the powers of darkness, against whose wiles and devices it was not possible for us to stand, if we had not been upheld by his almighty power and grace.

And though it must be confessed, that to be the progenitor of the Messiah was an inconceivably high honor—yet to be savingly interested in him, and united to him as members of his mystical body, and made fellow-heirs with him of all the glory and felicity of Heaven, is an infinitely higher honor. And all this is given to us, so that in all the points which David enumerates, we are far above him:

our election is from a far more degraded state;

our elevation is to a far higher throne;

our preservation is from far greater dangers, and more powerful enemies;

and our destiny is to an infinitely higher honor than any which a carnal relation to Christ could confer!

How well then may we exclaim, What are we, that we should ever be brought to such a state as this?

That this subject may be brought home more powerfully to our hearts and consciences, let us comprehend it under two pertinent reflections:

1. How astonishing has been God’s love to us!

Well may we say with David, “Is this the manner of man, O Lord God?” No; nothing like it ever did, or could, exist among men.

Man selects the most worthy as the objects of his love. But God has chosen the most unworthy, even us, who had reduced ourselves to the condition of the fallen angels, and deserved nothing but their portion at his hands.

Man confers but small benefits, which, however valued by his fellows, scarcely deserve a thought. But God confers riches and honors which far exceed all human comprehension.

Man soon repents of the favors he has conferred, when those on whom he has bestowed them prove themselves unworthy of them. But “the gifts and calling of God are without repentance” on his part, Romans 11:29; yes, “if it had not been that He was unchangeable, not a soul among us could ever have been saved, Malachi 3:6.”

Further, what man bestows is but for a little time; the present short life is the only season wherein we can possess any benefits conferred by man. But what God bestows, he gives forever and ever; and death, so far from terminating our felicity, brings us into the most complete and everlasting enjoyment of it.

“Behold then, what manner of love is this with which the Father has loved us!” Truly, if David was quite overwhelmed with the favors conferred on him, then much more may we, whose obligations are so infinitely higher, and more permanent than his!

2. How faint and cold is our love to him!

See David coming into the presence of his God, and sitting in the temple before him. His mind is quite filled with a sense of gratitude, and words seem altogether inadequate to express his feelings. Yet, notwithstanding our obligations to God so infinitely exceed his, how rarely has God ever seen us in the posture of David! Many of us, it is to be feared, have never spent so much as one hour in our whole lives, in his contemplations, and in his exercises.

Do you ask, How shall I attain his frame? Beg of God to work it in you by his Spirit. And especially do as he did. He determined to promote to the very utmost of his power the honor and glory of his heavenly Benefactor; and then it was that God revealed to him all the purposes of his grace respecting the raising up of a son from his loins to execute the work which he had contemplated, and to make that son of his the progenitor of the Messiah himself. In like manner, improve for God all the faculties and powers that you possess; and in honoring God you yourselves shall be honored. Only exert yourselves for God, and everything which you do, or only devise, for him, shall return in blessings into your own bosom!

Charles Simeon

2 Samuel 6:22

“I will become even more undignified than this, and I will be humiliated in my own eyes.”

A measure of firmness is necessary in the whole of our interaction with mankind, to prevent us from being drawn aside from the path of wisdom into a compliance with the prejudices and passions of those around us. But in all that pertains to religion it is more especially necessary; because in opposition to true piety, the current is exceeding strong; and we must inevitably be borne away by it, if we do not cleave unto our God with full purpose of heart.

The great and powerful may be supposed to be more free than others from the influence of public opinion; but their very elevation exposes them to storms and tempests more than others; and they have therefore the more need of firmness, to bear up against the taunts with which they will be assailed, in proportion as their zeal for God is ardent and conspicuous.

David was a mighty monarch; yet not even he could serve God according to his conscience without exciting the contempt and indignation of one most nearly related to him. But from the words which we have just read, we see how manfully he withstood the temptation. Let us notice,

I. The trial he met with.

This was very severe.

He was bringing up the ark to Mount Zion; and had good reason to believe, that the service he was performing was pleasing and acceptable in the sight of God. Hence his soul overflowed with joy; and in the fullness of his heart, “he danced before the Lord with all his might, verse 14.” “As the ark came into the city, Michal, Saul’s daughter, looking through a window, saw him leaping and dancing before the Lord, and despised him in her heart, verse 16.”

Unconscious of the impression he had made on her mind, he went home to bless both her and all his house; but instead of finding the reception which he had expected as suited to the occasion, he was greeted with reproaches more keen and scandalous than one should have supposed it possible for the most ingenious malice to invent, “When David returned home to bless his household, Michal daughter of Saul came out to meet him and said, “How the king of Israel has distinguished himself today, disrobing in the sight of the slave girls of his servants as any vulgar fellow would!” verse 20.”

How must he be thunder-struck, if I may so say, with such a greeting as this! To hear such a construction put upon his conduct! to be accused of an act which no one that was not lost to all sense of decency would commit even in private, and much less in the presence of thousands! to be accused of committing this too under the guise of religious zeal! and to hear this accusation from the lips of his own wife, and in language too as acrimonious and insulting as Hell itself could inspire! and all this at a moment when his soul, inflamed only with love to God, was enrapt into the third heavens! How inconceivably painful must this have been! Methinks, the cursings of Shimei were nothing in comparison with this.

Yet do we see in this, what all who are zealous for their God must expect.

Religious zeal is hated by the world, who will never fail to misconstrue it as proceeding from some hateful principle, and as forming a cloak for some hidden abomination. Pride, conceit, fanaticism, and hypocrisy, are usually considered as the springs of action to those who profess godliness, especially if they bear any conspicuous part in the service of their God—their very activity is made the ground of accusation against them. Thus it has been in every age.

David “wept and chastened himself with fasting; and that was turned to his reproach, Psalm 69:9-11.” John the Baptist came in an abstemious way; and the people said of him, “He has a devil!” The Lord Jesus Christ came in a way more suited to the liberty of the gospel dispensation; and his enemies took occasion from that to revile him as a “gluttonous man, and a drunkard, a friend of publicans and sinners! Luke 7:33-34.”

Thus it is also in the present day; and thus we must expect to find it; for “the servant cannot be above his Lord; if they have called the Master of the house Beelzebub, much more will they those of his household, Matthew 10:24-25.” Our blessed Lord has told us, that, “if the world hated him, they will hate us also John 15:18;” that they will “speak all manner of evil against us falsely for his sake, Matthew 5:11;” and that they will even think they render service to God by putting to death his most faithful servants, John 16:2.

Nor will any eminence in rank, or power, or talent, or wisdom, or piety, exempt us from this lot. If David could not escape it, then neither can we. If Paul was said to be “beside himself Acts 26:24,” then those who tread in his steps must not expect to be regarded as of a sound mind. Nor will this opprobrious treatment proceed only from avowed enemies; our nearest friends and relatives will often be foremost in the assault; and “our bitterest foes may be those of our own household, Matthew 10:36.”

Having seen somewhat of David’s trial, let us consider,

II. The determination he formed in consequence of it.

Neither abashed nor irritated, he calmly avowed his unalterable determination,

1. To serve his God without fear.

If to bear this open testimony for his God, and to glorify him thus in the sight of all Israel, was to render himself vile, “he would be more and more vile” as long as he lived. A noble resolution this, and worthy to be adopted by every man! Are the servants of Satan bold, and shall Jehovah’s servants be cowards? Shall the ungodly commit all manner of iniquity without shame, and the godly be ashamed of walking in the ways of righteousness? No! there should be a holy energy in the soul of every saint, a readiness to rise to the occasion, however formidable that occasion is; he should have within him the elasticity of a strong well-tempered spring, whose reaction is always augmented by the pressure. If true religion is ridiculed through the whole land, so that not a second family could be found in all Israel to adhere to God, we should say with Joshua, “As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord! Joshua 24:15.” Reproach for Christ’s sake should be regarded as an honor, Acts 5:41. And, though not coveted—persecution yet be welcomed as the truest riches, Hebrews 11:26. It should be considered as a precious gift of God for Christ’s sake, Philippians 1:29, and be gloried in as a participation of Christ’s sufferings, and a means of advancing his glory, 1 Peter 4:12-14.

We should be cautious indeed not by extravagance or misconduct of any kind to merit reproach; but, if it comes for righteousness’ sake, we should rejoice in it, and glorify God for it, “taking pleasure in it,” as a testimony in our favor, and a pledge of an accumulated and everlasting weight of glory! 1 Peter 4:15-16, 2 Corinthians 12:10, Romans 8:17, Luke 21:13, 2 Timothy 2:12, 2 Corinthians 4:17.

Nor is it only against reproach that we should stand, but against the most envenomed persecution that men or devils can raise against us. We should be moved by no threats, however cruel; but be ready to lay down our lives for Christ’s sake, Acts 20:24, and account martyrdom a ground, not of pity and condolence, but of congratulation and joy, Philippians 2:17-18.

2. To abase himself without shame.

The chief reason of Michal’s rage was, that she thought David degraded himself by this public exhibition, which, however it might have befit one of his inferior servants, was unsuited to his dignity. But David felt that a monarch in the sight of God is no more than other men; and that any elevation of rank which he possessed above others was rather a call to honor God the more, and not a reason for withholding from God any expression of gratitude and love. Hence he determined to regard himself as on a level with the least and lowest of his subjects in everything that had respect to God. Nor would he value himself on this as an act of condescension, and thus convert humility into pride; but he would really be in his own estimation, what he professed before others to be, “less than the least of all the saints, Ephesians 3:8,” unworthy to “be a door-keeper in the house of his God, Psalm 84:10,” or to unloose the latchet of his Master’s shoes, John 1:27.

And this is the frame of mind which we also should cultivate. So far from regarding earthly distinctions as a reason for rendering to God a more measured service, as though the highest acts of piety were fitted only for the vulgar—we should consider wealth, honor, learning, and influence of every kind, as talents committed to us for the purpose of honoring God with them, and of rendering our example more effectual for the good of others.

And while the world is reproaching us for the excess of our piety, we should be ever abasing ourselves on account of our defects in piety. If we keep in view the perfect requirements of God’s law, and the unbounded obligations which he has laid us under by the gift of his only-begotten Son—then how infinitely short of our duty will our best services appear! “Our very righteousnesses, in this view, will be as filthy rags! Isaiah 64:6,” in which we can never hope to appear before God, and which can never come up with acceptance before him, until they have been washed in the Redeemer’s blood! Revelation 7:14.

Thus, whether men admire or reproach us for our piety, we should equally abase ourselves, as in reality deserving neither their admiration nor their reproach, but rather their pity on account of the defectiveness of our services, and the smallness of our spiritual attainments.

Address,

1. Those who cast reproaches on the saints.

Behold Michal and David on this occasion, and say, whether you would not rather be the persecuted saint, than the malignant persecutor? Is there a creature in the world who must not acknowledge the superiority of David’s state, in the midst of all the ignominy that was cast upon him?

Such then is the state of God’s people in the midst of all the calumnies with which they are loaded, and such is the light in which their calumniators are regarded by Almighty God.

In the instance before us, God marked his displeasure against Michal, by inflicting the curse of barrenness upon her to her dying hour, verse 23. And he warns us also in the most solemn manner to avoid the rock on which she split, “So scoff no more, or your punishment will be even greater! Isaiah 28:22.”

If we choose not to serve God ourselves, let us beware how by scoffing and ridicule we discourage others; for our Lord tells us, that “It would have been better for us that a millstone were hanged about our neck, and we were cast into the depths of the sea, rather than causing one of his little ones to stumble, Matthew 18:6.”

To perish under the guilt of our own sins will be terrible enough; but to have “the blood of others also required at our hands” will be an inconceivable augmentation of our guilt and misery. This then would I entreat of all who despise and persecute the followers of Christ. Look into the Scriptures; see whether you approve of Cain, of Ishmael, of Michal, of Festus, or of any who bear the stamp and character of revilers in the Sacred Records. See whether in your consciences you do not rather side with Abel, and Isaac, and David, and Paul, and all the other sufferers, “of whom the world itself was not worthy! Hebrews 11:38.” And if your own consciences bear testimony to the saints, dare not to walk in the steps of their oppressors, persecuting the living saints, while you raise memorials to the dead, Matthew 23:29-31.

2. Those who are called to sustain reproaches.

Think it not strange that reproach is cast upon you for righteousness’ sake; for thus it has been from the beginning, “Those who have been born only of the flesh ever have persecuted those who are born after the Spirit,” and so they will continue to do even to the end.

You may, if you please, avoid persecution, “if you will be of the world, the world will love its own.” But are you prepared to sacrifice all your hopes and prospects in the eternal world? James says, that “the friendship of the world is enmity with God; and that those who will be the friends of the world, must be the enemies of God.”

Say then: Are you in doubt which of the alternatives to choose? What good can the world do you by its friendship, or what evil can it inflict by its enmity? To kill the body is the worst that they can do. But what will not God do for his faithful servants? What will he not inflict on those who turn back from him? Can you think of being denied by Christ before the assembled universe, and not tremble, Matthew 10:32-33. O consider this, and you will not hesitate a moment whom to serve; but will “choose that good part which shall never be taken away from you.” You will gladly “suffer affliction with the people of God, and esteem the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures of the whole world!”

Charles Simeon

2 Samuel 6:14

“And David danced before the Lord with all his might.”

True religion is, indeed, a source of joy. In this light it was viewed by the angelic host, when they proclaimed to the shepherds the birth of our Savior, saying, “Behold, we bring you glad tidings of great joy!” And thus was it found to be by the converts on the day of Pentecost, the Ethiopian Eunuch, the people of Samaria, Acts 8:8; Acts 8:39, and by all, in every place, who received the word aright, Acts 15:3. The Psalms of David place this matter beyond a doubt, they being almost one continued effusion of praise and thanksgiving.

In the history before us we have an extraordinary exhibition, strongly confirmatory of this truth. David was bringing up the ark of God to Jerusalem; and so strong were the emotions of joy within him, that, in the presence of not less than thirty thousand of his subjects, he danced before the Lord with all his might.

Let us consider,

I. The expressions of David’s joy.

Certainly, at first sight, it appears strange that a monarch, stripped of his royal robes, and clad in the simple clothes, should be dancing thus extravagantly, as it might appear, at the head of all his subjects. But he was serving and honoring his God; and therefore, under any circumstances, his joy would be great. But it was exceedingly heightened:

1. By his reflections upon the past.

The ark, with the exception of one short interval, had abode at Kirjath-jearim, for nearly fifty years, where it had been carried twenty years after its restoration by the Philistines who had captured it. David had greatly desired to bring it up to Jerusalem, where he had prepared a tabernacle for its reception. He ordered it to be put on a new cart, and drawn by oxen, in the manner in which the Philistines had restored it; forgetting that God had given special commands, that none but the Kohathites, who were Levites, should carry it; and that they should never either behold or touch it, but that it should be covered, and they should bear it by means of the staffs which were made for that purpose.

In its progress, the ark was shaken, at the threshing-floor of Nachon; and Uzzah, one of the conductors of it, put forth his hand to hold it up, lest it should fall; and for this error God struck him dead upon the spot! This judgment was intended as a rebuke, not to Uzzah only, but to all the priests and Levites who were present; and especially to David, who had been so regardless of the divine commands, with which he doubtless was well acquainted, and of which he ought to have been most strictly observant.

By this judgment David was disheartened, and he dared not to proceed, lest he himself, also, should be subject to the divine displeasure. Accordingly, the ark was turned out of its course, and carried to the house of Obed-edom, the Gittite. But during its continuance there, for the space of three months, such manifest and extraordinary blessings flowed down upon Obed-edom and all his family, that David was assured that God was reconciled towards him; and, inspired with fresh zeal, he proceeded again to bring it up from thence, taking especial care that everything should be conducted in God’s appointed way. After advancing only six steps, he stopped to offer burnt-offerings and peace-offerings; and then he felt in his soul, that God had accepted this service, and would crown it with good success, 1 Chronicles 15:1-3; 1 Chronicles 15:11-15.

Now, to enter into David’s feelings aright, we must mark the contrast between this present effort and that which had so lately failed; and we must remember, that, not content with expressing his gratitude to God by secret aspirations, he strove, by his open and visible acknowledgments, to inspire all his people with the same ardent gratitude with which his own bosom was filled. This will account for what might otherwise appear extravagant in this outward demonstration of his joy.

2. By his anticipations of the future.

The ark was the symbol of the divine presence; and by having it at Jerusalem, he hoped that he should have more easy access to Jehovah at all seasons, and bring down, both on himself and all his people, a rich abundance of spiritual blessings! Of this, David himself informs us in the 132rd Psalm, which he wrote on that express occasion. He tells us, that he had sworn he would not come up into his own house, nor go up into his bed, until he should have found out a place for the Lord, a habitation for the mighty God of Jacob. He then adds, “Lo, we heard of it at Ephratah, (Kiriath-jearim,) and found it in the fields of the wood; and we will go into his tabernacle, and worship at his footstool.”

Then, declaring what his prayers to God should be, he anticipates the future advent of the Messiah, and states the answers he should receive to his prayers, repeating the very words of his petitions as the precise terms of God’s promises, “The Lord has chosen Zion; he has desired it for his habitation. This is my rest forever; here will I dwell; for I have desired it. I will abundantly bless her provision; I will satisfy her poor with bread; I will also clothe her priests with salvation; and her saints shall shout aloud for joy. There will I make the horn of David to bud; I have ordained a lamp for my anointed. His enemies will I clothe with shame; but upon himself shall his crown flourish, Psalm 132:1-7; Psalm 132:13-18.”

After such prospects as these, can we wonder at any expressions of his joy, however ardent, or however extraordinary? Methinks, his zeal in this instance was temperance, and his excess was sobriety.

And now let me show,

II. What occasion we also have for joy at this time.

This whole matter was typical of our blessed Lord’s ascension into Heaven. In the 68th Psalm, written by David on this occasion, he says, “The chariots of God are tens of thousands and thousands of thousands; the Lord [has come] from Sinai into his sanctuary. When you ascended on high, you led captives in your train; you received gifts from men, even from the rebellious–that you, O LORD God, might dwell there! Psalm 68:17-18.” And Paul quotes these very words as declarative of our Lord’s ascension to Heaven, and the out-pouring of the Spirit upon his Church as the very bestowment of those gifts which he had obtained for her, Ephesians 4:8-12.

Here, then, we have already marked for us the nobler grounds of joy which we possess at this time,

1. In the dignity of the person so exalted.

The ark was dignified as a shadow and an emblem of the Lord Jesus; but we commemorate the exaltation of the Lord Jesus himself. And I wish you particularly to notice how this also was announced by the holy Psalmist, “Lift up your heads, O you gates; be lifted up, you ancient doors, that the King of glory may come in. Who is this King of glory? The LORD strong and mighty, the LORD mighty in battle. Lift up your heads, O gates; lift them up, you ancient doors, that the King of glory may come in. Who is he, this King of glory? The LORD Almighty, he is the King of glory! Psalm 24:7-10.”

2. In the richness of the benefits imparted by him.

In the passage before mentioned we see, in a general view, the gifts which our ascended Savior bestows upon his rebellious subjects. But who can recount them all, or even estimate so much as one of them aright?

See the first-fruits of those benefits on the day of Pentecost; and behold them spread over the face of the whole earth, and poured out in the richest possible abundance at this day. See the Savior “seated at the right hand of God, far above all principalities and powers, and might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come!” See how God has put all things under his feet, and given him to be head over all things to the Church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all, Ephesians 1:20-23.” See him “exalted thus, and having a name given him above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in Heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father! Philippians 2:9-11.”

All these his victories must be contemplated, and all the felicity of his redeemed people both in time and eternity, before we can estimate, in any measure, what ground we have for joy in the resurrection and ascension of our blessed Lord.

My dear brethren, only view these things by faith as David did, and even your lowest notes will resemble those of “that sweet singer of Israel.” “God has ascended amid shouts of joy, the LORD amid the sounding of trumpets. Sing praises to God, sing praises; sing praises to our King, sing praises. For God is the King of all the earth; sing to him a psalm of praise! Psalm 47:5-7.”

But it will be profitable to inquire,

III. How far the expressions of our joy should correspond with David’s.

In point of ardor, we should not fall short of him, but should, if possible, exceed him. Yet in the mode of expressing our joy, I think he is not a proper pattern for us.

1. There is a great difference between his dispensation and ours.

The Jewish dispensation abounded with “carnal ordinances;” and every service of the saints was marked with outward and visible signs. Every penitent that would obtain mercy from the Lord must carry his appointed offering, and conform in everything to some peculiar law. The same must be done by those who would return thanks to God for mercies received.

But we, under the Christian dispensation, are to enter into our chamber, and shut our door, that we may not be seen by men, but be seen by Him only whom we serve—the heart-searching God, Matthew 6:6.

The Jews needed the priests to mediate between God and them.

But we may approach God, every one of us for ourselves, through that One Mediator, the Lord Jesus Christ; yes, and may enter into the holy of holies itself, through the blood of his sacrifice which he once offered for us on the cross, Hebrews 10:19-22. This, then, marks a broad line of distinction between David’s services and ours, and renders such “bodily exercise” as his, unsuitable to us.

2. Our frame of mind should be more spiritual and more refined.

I will not say that the body is not to participate in the emotions of our minds; for in this our fallen state such a sympathy must of necessity be called forth by any intense feeling, whether of joy or sorrow. But there is a delicacy and refinement in the Christian’s feelings; and the less they savor of what is physical, the better. A Christian’s joy is “the joy of the Holy Spirit;” and when it rises to the highest pitch, so as to be utterly “unspeakable,” it is then a “glorious joy,” such as the glorious saints and angels experience in Heaven, 1 Peter 1:8. Behold all of them before the throne of God; they are all prostrate on their faces, while yet they sing praises to God and to the Lamb. Their joy is a meek and holy joy; and I am sure that such is the joy that befits us in this lower world, compassed as we are with so many infirmities. I would rather recommend that, because it will be less likely to cast a stumbling-block before us, and less likely to deceive your own souls.

I am far from justifying Michal for casting such severe reflections on David. But her spirit shows what feelings will be generated in the bosoms of the ungodly, by anything which seems to border on excess. By an inattention to the feelings of others, we may do considerable injury both to ourselves and them also. Our Lord, therefore, cautions us “not to cast our pearls before swine, lest they turn again and rend us.” On such occasions, I think, we should rather put a veil over our faces, as Moses did, than blind them by a splendor which they cannot bear. Yet we are not so to regard the ungodly, as to be deterred from serving God in any, and in every, way that he requires. But if we bear in mind the infirmities of others, we may the better hope to allure them to the service of God, and to bring them to a participation of all the blessings which we ourselves enjoy.

Charles Simeon